Its the end of the 2013/2014 school year and our students are excited to be putting together "Presentations of Learning". We've asked that they use the three "Core Competencies" in BCs draft curriculum to anchor their presentations and tell stories of their learning with respect to these three competencies. Here's my own Presentation of Learning.
Artifacts and Examples Shared:
Showing posts with label Change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Change. Show all posts
Monday, June 9, 2014
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
PBL Learning Team
A group of Teachers met today at Kelly Road to discuss Project Based Learning. We've ordered BIE's PBL Starter Kit as a resources and will be working through that together as a way to inform and evaluate our practice. We've also started a blog dedicated exclusively to the group. Its online here.
One of the things we did was share our questions. Here's what we came up with:
One of the things we did was share our questions. Here's what we came up with:
- What questions do we have?
- How does PBL work?
- How does PBL benefit our students?
- motivation
- engagement
- success
- building core competencies (thinking, communicating, personal and social competency)
- Definition of “The Educated Citizen” (we heard this recently and understand its in the BC school regulations, but do not know where)
- literacy and numeracy foundations
- understanding rich content
- core competencies
- How do we cover curriculum through PBL?
- What is “true PBL”, is there “true PBL”?
- How much information is required before students jump in?
- How much Teacher Direction/ Guidance is needed?
- How do we facilitate and let students drive?
- What role do driving questions play?
- How do we come up with really good driving questions?
- What skills and experiences do students bring to projects?
- How do different disciplines come together in projects?
We agreed its the highlighted questions that matter most. Its the difference this way of learning makes in the lives of our students that matters most. We want to be intentional about evaluating our practice based on the difference it makes for students. We are excited to be learning together!
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Talk of Change - Embracing Project Based Learning
change_thoughts, a photo by MMcDonough on Flickr.
I was very cognizant in putting it together that I wanted to create opportunities for rich conversations and sharing of ideas, activities, and strategies. I borrowed and adapted questions from David Truss's presentation "7 Ways to Transform Your Classroom". The questions participants discussed together and shared thoughts on were a powerful part of the day, in my opinion.
Selling anything, though, is not easy. As George Couros points out, we need to be strategic if we want to help others embrace change. George poses three questions that we can answer for Educators as we present change. Let me share my thoughts on them as it relates to PBL:
- How will this save me time?
- Such a valuable question for Educators. I want to acknowledge that adopting and settling into new Teaching practices takes time and energy, we all know that. For me the investment pays off in the product, and we'll get to that in a minute. In my experience the payoff with PBL is in two places. First, I save time preparing discrete tasks. My projects are almost always chunked into pieces that stretch over 2-6 hours of class time. So, once students are engaged in a new activity we roll with it for a few days, allowing me to do much more guiding, facilitating, informal breakout workshops, and formative assessment. Secondly, I save time in assessment. PBL lends itself beautifully to AFL practices that look a lot like students developing ownership by understanding where they are at and where they are going in their learning. This requires coaching and practice, but does not require that I collect small pieces of work daily, or even every few days to document the small steps in their learning journey. I should say to that my context is also a BYOD program. This saves a huge amount of time for me photocopying discrete tasks. I've moved my project outlines to Google Drive so students have current (and ever-changing) copies shared with them and they can be set up to comment on the outline or even edit as needed.
- We need to focus on different, not more
- Yes. Some of the shifts I've been cognizant of in my practice as it related to PBL are in the ways I synthesize and summarize information, share resources, and share my expertise. As I move to PBL I fully desire to shift my instructional methods from Teacher centered to Learner centered. It strikes me as odd that so often we stand up and synthesize and summarize content for students. We need to teach students to synthesize and summarize content. If we are too worried about covering the content to let the students summarize it for themselves then perhaps we are trying to cover too much content (and I don't mean to get too involved in the debate over covering content here, I am more interesting in suggesting that this is one way that PBL is different and not more). My argument on resources is very much the same. Students need to be able to effectively find and critically curate content online. We are doing them a disservice if we find it for them, and we are doing them an even greater disservice if we do not teach our students to use a variety of resources. So we shift from finding and curating and sharing resources for our students to having them find, curate, and share their own resources. Lastly, PBL comes with a shift in expertise. Methods of Inquiry seek to involve community and experts outside the school. Although I'm not there yet in my practice, efforts to do this have been rewarding. I believe the same can be said about the learning community that exists within the classroom. Prensky writes about a Partnering pedagogy where we are all Teachers and we are all Learners. We need to shift our practice enough to allow students to embrace the roll as the experts that they are and are becoming.
- Is this better?
- I believe so. In the presentation I respond to the "Why?" question with three arguments: because of shared experiences, because of shared findings, and because of shared understanding of best practice. There's a lot to unpack there, but I'll leave that to the presentation itself. After reading Couros's post the piece of this I feel I missed was the way in which its better for me. Ultimately I am most satisfied as a Teacher when the Learners I'm working with are most satisfied in their Learning. To that end, yes. PBL has allowed for deeper, richer, more meaning learning for my students and left me more satisfied in my Teaching!
Do you agree? What burning PBL questions are on your mind? Does PBL save you time? What shifts has it come with in your practice? Is it better for you and your students? What conversations are you interested in having as you consider change?
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Making Feedback an Event
What does feedback look like in your context? How has giving and accepting feedback been modeled in your experience?
Peer Feedback is a powerful classroom tool for a variety of reasons. It helps foster a collaborative culture, exposes students to varying ideas and perspectives, serves as a form of positive peer pressure, and gives students an opportunity to put their best foot forward as they prepare their work for feedback. I believe feedback can also be used to teach content, and I want to improve the way we do feedback in my classes so we can maximize its benefit for our learning.
In this case students had prepared sketches of the models they were planning on building and animating to bring mitosis or meiosis to life. The models will have a QR code attached linking to a video which will explain the model and bring it to life either visually or orally. Although many of the sketches were not fully developed I believe students benefited from thinking through their plan and creating their sketch as well as by looking at the plans and sketches of others.
What I really enjoyed about this round of feedback was that it was very much an event (and for my purposes an excellent form of formative assessment). Students were asked to come with their sketches. Sketches were then touched up to ensure that they were self explanatory to viewers who were circulating by for 3 minutes at a time. Students then added to their sketches notes to guide the feedback. They also added comments to let the viewer know what they liked about their work, what was tricky, and what they thought they might do differently (a suggestion from a student-parent in my PLN, thanks Greg). Feedback then proceeded in 3 minute rounds (a time chosen based one total time available, but it actually worked quite well). This countdown timer was used to add an edgy, funky, fun structure to the event. Students enjoyed it, and agreed that it was comfortable, beneficial, and improved their knowledge of the content.
As we continually seek to improve the quality of feedback one of Dylan William's suggestions (from "Embedded Formative Assessment") I've enjoyed is to collect the post-it feedback afterward and post is on the board. Students are then encouraged to look at all the feedback and vote on which pieces are most useful to the reader.
At the end of the day I want the feedback experience to be valuable enough that students come prepared, and participate to the best of their ability to their own benefit and the benefit of their classroom. So, how can we do feedback better?
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Professional Learning Plan 2013/2014
![]() |
| Flickr (http://bit.ly/15BvNGX)http://bit.ly/15BvNGX) |
My plan is to focus on the PBL process this year by targeting critique and developing a critique protocol with students. Here's the full plan:
Steve Chase’s Professional Learning Plan 2013/2014
My Learning Intention:
Will a class-created peer critique protocol improve students ownership of their learning, use of one another as learning resources, and understanding of course content?
Criteria:
- Students will agree that peer critique was comfortable 80% of the time
- Students will agree that peer critique was beneficial 80% of the time
- Students will agree that peer critique furthered their understanding of course content 80% of the time
My Plan:
- Develop peer critique language and structure with students (protocol)
- Use peer critique at set points in projects to allow students to present their work to peers and receive feedback
- Survey students each project to see if peer critique protocol is meeting the criteria
Questions:
- How can we structure critique sessions so students feel comfortable sharing their work?
- How can we structure critique sessions so students feel the time is beneficial?
- How can we structure critique sessions so it is rigorous in terms of content?
Descriptive Feedback:
I plan on using Beth Wilcox as a resource in building the critique protocol, but this inquiry is largely based on my students response to this as a practice, so their feedback is essential.
Self and Peer Support:
I’ve met and discussed feedback and critique in broader terms with a small group of teachers on staff and would appreciate the opportunity to meet with them in the future if possible.
I would also love the opportunity to explore more Project Based Learning resources on my own or with others. A few that seem particularly relevant are from www.bie.org: “PBL for 21st Century Success”, and “PBL Handbook”.
Ownership and Where:
I will be posting updates on my blog (http://chaselearning.blogspot.ca/), but would also be happy to share my learning with peers.
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Year End Presentation of Learning
In wrapping up our first year of our Project Based Learning Choice Program students created Presentations of Learning. Here's mine:
Friday, May 31, 2013
Are you becoming an increasingly effective communicator?
Isn`t that the
question we want to be asking ourselves? Isn`t it a question we want our students to be asking
themselves?
I have been given the
opportunity to work with a local group of educators to help design a communication competency continuum that will be a part of BCs new curriculum.
Sharon Joerski is the consultant hired by the Ministry who`s been bringing us
together and bringing together our ideas regarding communication competency .
So far we have brought
a few samples of student work and have been pulling out the major themes and
shifts from pre-K to grade 12. Our goal over the next few months is to identify
the major elements in communication competency, and illustrate each of them with
examples of student work. Once we have improved our definition of the elements of
communication we can begin to more clearly describe levels of proficiency in
each of the elements.
The model that`s
been proposed to us is of a continuum presented in a series of concentric
circles, with elements extending from
the inner circle toward the outer rings. A tree metaphor has been suggested too
as an appropriate one in that additional ``rings`` can always been added as a
learner improves their communication skills. This graphic would describe
communication with a number of I can statements. The statements would link to
examples of student work as well as resources for classroom teachers.
As I look at the work my students are doing, and engage in professional conversations like these regarding communication, I feel more strongly then ever that our new curriculum needs to be focused on competencies that will allow today's learners to reach their full potential in tomorrow's workplaces. So as we seek to improve communication in the 21st century I am confident we are on the right track!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


